About Rediscover911.org
This site was originally created in about four hours and due to a fit of rage by one generally clear thinking and rationally dedicated participant of the 9/11 truth movement who was infuriated when he found what appeared to be, regardless of true motive, yet another attempt to make the movement look bad by associating it with anti-Semitism. 9/11 truth is not about blaming people who we loosely speculate may have been responsible. Most in this movement would like further investigation that might determine the guilty parties, but anyone with limited logical capacity recognizes very clearly that it's irresponsible and downright irrational to claim that we have "proof" of who was responsible.
Casual and reasonable speculation with peers may not harm anyone, but public statements about proof, specifically those that are framed in a manner that is insulting to one culture or ethnic group are simply ugly and do a great deal of damage to the credibility of a movement that is already largely lacking the mainstream public's trust and respect.
So no, we don't know that the "Jews did 9/11." We don't know that "9/11 was a Zionist plot." We don't know that "Israel was responsible." Without proof, making those statements is both foolish and highly insulting to anyone with any cultural sensitivity or dedication to truth.
Unfortunately, there is a good deal of reason to suspect that some but certainly not all of this speculation is motivated by the intention to undermine the 9/11 truth movement. With the historical precedent of Cointelpro as well as some very clear recent confirmation of the intent to undermine our cause from within, intentional disruption is likely. With a good deal of experience with the shadier people involved in 9/11 truth, and with a number of specific red flags in mind, specifically their attacks on 911truth.org, the author of this site considers it quite possible that Rediscover911.com is not a representation of a sincere commitment to 9/11 truth for all those involved.
The author would like to clarify that he is not insinuating that Ed Kendrick or any specific individual involved is getting paid to promote Rediscover911.com. And it may be the case that those involved, despite the lack of proof, sincerely believe that Israel was responsible for 9/11. However, the possibility of intentional disruption should not be ignored.
While we may not be able to exactly determine the intentions of those undermining the 9/11 truth movement, we should not simply assume that everyone is acting in good faith. The intent of the author is to inspire a response to such attacks that is motivated by the possibility that more than ignorance is involved.